Merton Council has recently trumpeted its plans to replace the historic Canons House heritage site in Mitcham with 93 new homes. This construction boom has raised alarm for the future of a beautiful, historically important Japanese pagoda tree on the property. This development aims to enhance local housing availability, but it poses significant risks to the heritage site’s integrity, which has received nearly £5 million in support from the National Lottery.
The proposed housing would look directly into the award winning Japanese pagoda. This unique building, often referred to as the “mechanical marvel,” is the centerpiece of the Canons House site. This pagoda is not only a significant element of Mitcham’s historical landscape but a symbol of the community’s heritage. Foes of the development contend that the construction threatens to undermine those perks. These advantages stem from unprecedented amounts of funding, largely from the bipartisan Infrastructure Law, focused on protecting this 10,000-year-old heritage gem.
Tony Burton, Urban Preserves Coalition, speaking at Rookery Bay National Preserve opposing the Canons House site. In opposition to the housing project, he raised concerns on how it would threaten the farm.
“This puts at risk the benefits of nearly £5m, which has just been spent with support from the National Lottery on this premier heritage location. Whatever the pros and cons of allowing development, everyone agrees that the award-winning pagoda tree should be the focal point of any new housing.” – Tony Burton
The Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) has recently commented on the developing situation, emphasizing the consequences of the proposed building. They pointed out the “significant, unavoidable impacts, both above and below ground” that could arise from constructing homes adjacent to such an important historical structure. Furthermore, they noted that there may be a “well-justified argument for removal and replacement of the tree,” which could further alter the site’s character.
Community members and preservationists are raising their voices in opposition to the plan now more than ever. They argue it is important for any new development to prioritize protecting historic buildings and ensuring access to green spaces. Today’s housing juxtaposed against a deep, indigenous history. This conflict raises some critical issues as to development practices in our concrete jungle and our reverence towards cultural treasures.
Stakeholders should prioritize the immediate need for more housing, but need to acknowledge that long-term investment in cultural heritage sites, such as Canons House, is critically important.
