Australia has joined a coalition of nations in imposing sanctions against two prominent members of Israel’s government, Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. This decision brings Australia into line with the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. Beyond this impact, the agreement serves as an encouraging diplomatic bright spot during this summer’s turbulent and ongoing Middle East crisis.
The sanctions consist travel bans and asset freezes on the two ministers. The second serves, in part, as a direct response to their controversial actions in the West Bank and as a response to the overall situation in Gaza. Despite this step, analysts suggest that Australia’s involvement is unlikely to elicit significant changes in Israeli policy but serves to send a clear message regarding the international community’s stance on human rights violations.
Context of the Sanctions
The sanctions had been aimed at Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over accusations they fomented extremist violence. They were under the most serious charge of perpetrating abuses against Palestinian human rights. The charges come as a result of the Israeli government’s discriminatory policies. Opponents cite the large amount of new settlement construction in the West Bank, maintaining that this makes a two-state solution impossible.
Penny Wong, Australia’s Foreign Minister, has similarly stated that a two-state solution is needed to address the root causes of this cycle of violence.
“We believe a two-state solution is the only way to end the cycle of violence.” – Penny Wong
Wong explained that the current Israeli government’s actions are indicative of the original peace framework’s rejection.
“And regrettably, it is also clear that the Netanyahu government rejects it. This is clear from its devastating military campaign in Gaza — civilians being killed by the thousands, children starving.” – Penny Wong
Following months of diplomatic preparation, Australia and its partner democracies announced bans. This action further underscores their joint efforts to combat alleged abuses by Israeli officials.
“This action is the result of many months of effort and coordination, and together, these countries are sending a message: you have ignored the international community, and we do not tolerate it.” – Penny Wong
Reactions and Implications
The coalition’s imposition of a regular set of sanctions has received mixed responses within Australia. Some politicians have voiced concerns over the effectiveness and appropriateness of targeting Israeli officials rather than addressing groups such as Hamas. Liberal frontbencher Andrew Bragg condemned the government’s move as a misuse of “Magnitsky-style” sanctions.
Ed Husic, the cabinet minister, recently called on Australia to impose sanctions on Israel. In saying that, he cited the nation’s blockade on humanitarian aid to Gaza as a prime motivating factor. This is a powerful testament to an evolving dialogue within Australian politics about her foreign policy’s complicity in Israel’s aggression towards Palestine.
The United States, one of Australia’s and Israel’s closest allies, has openly condemned these sanctions. The U.S. Ambassador to Israel reportedly blasted Australia’s approach. In doing so, he highlighted a sharp contrast in how these allied countries pursue policy toward the Middle East.
Long-term Impact and Future Considerations
Experts suggest that while the sanctions may not lead to immediate changes in Israeli governance or policy, they represent an important moral stance against human rights violations. Given this history, it is disappointing that Australia has not gone further in denouncing Israel’s settlement expansions and reaffirmed its belief in international law that deems settlements illegal.
In her recent announcement in August 2023, Wong pledged. She announced that the Australian government would return to using the term “occupied Palestinian territories” to describe the West Bank and Gaza. This change signifies a broader shift in language that aligns with international standards and may further influence Australia’s diplomatic relations in the region.
Debate rages about how these sanctions, and others like them, will affect long-term peace and stability. Yet, fundamental questions remain about how useful they will be in promoting constructive conversation and debate among Israelis and Palestinians. Critics within Australia demand clarity on how these measures will assist in returning hostages and achieving lasting peace in the Middle East.
