Queensland authorities are planning to extend police powers to search weapons in public space. This policy shift is included in the TIGER-like proposed “Jack’s Law,” the eponymous legislation introduced in Jack’s memory, 17-year-old Jack Beasley, who was stabbed to death while out with friends in 2019. This campaign gives police free rein to stop-and-frisk anyone in any public location at any time without probable cause or a warrant. It removes the current wandsing powers sunset clause, which would normally limit the powers trial period and expire next year, making these powers permanent.
The first round of wanding powers was deliberately targeted. All these places had a history of offences in the previous half year. Unlike these local provisions, with the proposed changes, Queensland police would acquire much wider power to search nearly anywhere in the state without a warrant. This initiative aligns with the commitment made by the Liberal National Party (LNP) to establish these powers permanently ahead of the upcoming state election.
Support for Jack’s Law
Brett Beasley, Jack’s father, has been an adamant supporter of the law, testifying in favor of making it permanent. He thinks that Jack’s Law is doing great things in Queensland, and he compares that to his law, saying that it’s saving lives.
“Making the law permanent is an absolute no-brainer.” – Brett Beasley
Beasley insists on highlighting the inspiring effects the law has had in practice since it passed. This confirms his conviction that it should remain an essential element of Queensland’s common law system.
Concerns Over Civil Liberties
Despite this widespread backing for the expanded wanding powers, these powers have not gone uncriticized, including by the Queensland Council of Civil Liberties. Newark City Council council’s president, Michael Cope, has expressed concern about the long-term effects of extending these powers permanently. He argues that previous expansions to such laws represent a “violation of fundamental civil liberties.”
Cope further warns that extending the wanding powers to shopping centres and venues could “create a permanent change in our civil liberties.” He emphasizes the need for caution, stating that “we should not allow tragic circumstances to lead to bad laws.” This position mirrors a growing and alarming concern among civil rights proponents that the advancement of public safety is often achieved at the expense of the individual’s constitutional rights.
Timing of the Proposal
Passed during what would have been Jack Beasley’s 23rd birthday, these proposed changes are worth examining. This timing adds an emotional layer to the legislative process, as the community remembers the young man whose tragic death prompted discussions about safety and security.
As the debate unfolds, Queensland lawmakers face a complex challenge: how to enhance public safety while ensuring that civil liberties are not unduly compromised. Jack’s Law will continue to be a major focus in the weeks and months ahead. Stakeholders are closely awaiting to see the positive and adverse impacts of this landmark legislative step.
