WA Labor’s Fishing Policy Sparks Controversy Amid Accusations of Political Maneuvering

Rebecca Adams Avatar

By

WA Labor’s Fishing Policy Sparks Controversy Amid Accusations of Political Maneuvering

The Western Australian (WA) Labor party faces criticism over its decision not to implement mandatory catch reporting for recreational fishers. Critics argue this move could jeopardize the survival of iconic species such as the dhufish. Accusations have arisen that WA Labor is engaging in what some call a "grubby deal" to secure votes ahead of the upcoming state election on March 8. This policy decision has sparked a heated debate among political parties and stakeholders in the fishing industry.

The WA Labor party's announcement promises to secure access entitlements and a minimum license period of at least ten years for commercial fishers. However, it has drawn criticism from the WA Fishing Industry Council (WAFIC) and its chief executive Melissa Haslam. She expressed concerns over the lack of mandatory catch reporting, suggesting that political motivations might be overshadowing sustainable practices.

"I don't think we should be playing politics, putting politics ahead of sustainable fishing," – Melissa Haslam

The WA Nationals leader Shane Love indicated his party's willingness to consider mandatory catch reporting following industry consultation. He emphasized the importance of establishing a "fit-for-purpose" framework that aligns with the broader fishing industry's needs. The Nationals' stance suggests a more cautious approach, prioritizing consensus among industry stakeholders before implementing changes.

Meanwhile, the WA Liberals have joined WA Labor in opposing mandatory reporting for recreational fishers, aligning themselves with maintaining current practices. This shared position has intensified accusations against both parties for potentially compromising fish sustainability for electoral gains.

Matt Taylor, chief executive of Fishing Families WA (FFWA), stressed the necessity of mandatory catch reporting to ensure responsible aquatic resource management. He voiced concern over the potential extinction risk to species like the dhufish if current policies persist.

"It's absolutely essential to responsible aquatic resource management moving forward." – Matt Taylor

Taylor's assertion highlights a fundamental disagreement within the fishing community, as his stance diverges from others in the seafood industry. The Western Rock Lobster Council (WRLC) has noted that FFWA lacks the authority to speak on sustainability reporting, adding another layer of complexity to the ongoing debate.

"[FFWA's stance] is actually inconsistent with the seafood industry's position." – Matt Taylor

The timing of WA Labor's announcement has raised eyebrows, with accusations that the party is catering to hobby fishers' votes ahead of the state election. Haslam criticized this approach, suggesting it reflects a political trade-off rather than a commitment to sustainable fishing practices.

"It just stinks of a political trade off, a grubby deal," – Melissa Haslam

Rebecca Adams Avatar
KEEP READING
  • Nostalgia and Anxiety Fuel Memes Amid Economic Uncertainty

  • Unheralded Defender Shines with Spectacular Mark to Secure Crows’ Victory

  • Growing Discontent Fuels Shift Against Labor in Bendigo East

  • Early Detection Key in Prostate Cancer Survival as Study Reveals Disparities Among Migrant Communities

  • Legal Setback for Refugee in Mental Health Injury Case Against Commonwealth

  • Rallying for Change: Protesters Demand Action Against Violence Toward Women