The Southern Grampians Shire Council has made the controversial decision to remove a number of London plane trees from the main street of Hamilton, a city in south-west Victoria. These trees, which have stood for over 40 years, have long been an emblematic feature of the streetscape, yet their removal has sparked significant public outcry and debate regarding both safety and environmental concerns.
Residents have expressed dismay at the council’s choice, particularly in light of the trees’ positive contributions to local climate, biodiversity, and even mental health. In response to these concerns, the council became concerned that the cherries made the streets too uncomfortable. In particular, they’re pointing out that the roots have raised the pavement. They say that this has led to untenable living conditions for residents. Older people with mobility challenges frequently skip the town center as a result.
Community Response and Campaign Efforts
Sarah Hope, a local advocate for preserving the trees, has led a campaign to save these iconic fixtures from removal. Reiterating the need for safety, she stressed that any safety concerns expressed are not only valid, but justified. She and her co-advocates knew that it was important to suggest other solutions rather than just allowing the trees to be removed.
“It became incumbent on me and other members of the group who did want to keep the trees to come up with a solution,” – Sarah Hope
Hope’s suggestions include replacing the London plane trees with other types of trees that may be more suitable for urban environments, as well as installing vertical gardens to maintain greenery in Hamilton’s streets. Even some of the council’s most ardent supporters have begun to question whether they failed to consider the full value of these trees.
Cr. Barber from Southern Grampians Shire Council acknowledged the significance of the trees but reiterated the need for accessible streets.
“The trees have long been an iconic fixture within our streets, but their impact cannot be ignored,” – Cr Barber
“We need streets that are safe for residents and visitors of all abilities so they can feel confident to shop and socialise in Hamilton.” – Cr Barber
Environmental Considerations and Future Implications
Almost contrary to the council’s reasoning, not all experts agree that it was the right call. Dr. Moore, a long-term local environmental advocate, has challenged the basis of the findings which resulted in the decision. He pointed out that Gray Street’s tightness shouldn’t rule it out from accommodating these value-adding trees.
“The issue here is that they simply don’t give them the priority that they should be given,” – Dr. Moore
Dr. Moore underscored the extraordinary value of the London plane trees. Their shade is essential to maintaining our urban heat island and so when I talked about them, I cautioned removal would increase urban summer temperatures tremendously.
“When those trees are removed, it will make a huge difference to the streetscape in Hamilton, and it will make a significant difference to temperatures in summer.” – Dr. Moore
An appointed advisory group continues to proactively evaluate the landscape. With Skyline, they will explore whether additional London plane trees in Hamilton should be cut down.
The Path Forward
The decision to remove the London plane trees is an important point in time for Hamilton. While some community members welcome the move as necessary for public safety, others lament the loss of a green symbol that contributes positively to the city’s identity. Hope has called the whole process a “trial balloon” for how environmental policy will dictate Hamilton’s future urban fabric.
“This is going to be the next best scenario for those that love a green centre of Gray Street,” – Sarah Hope
