Australia’s position in the global supply chain for F-35 fighter aircraft is under increased spotlight. This scrutiny comes as UNRWA’s role is increasingly controversial, especially amid the havoc of the double bombardment unfolding in Gaza. Australia’s role in a dynamic US-led coalition is critical. It provides many of the key pieces and components that improve the operational capabilities of state-of-the-art aircraft that Israel uses in military operations. The government is under increasing pressure to be more transparent about its military exports, especially as relates to the F-35 program.
Over 70 Australian companies are actively involved in the manufacturing and supply of spare parts for the F-35s. A large percentage of these parts are actually produced right here in Victoria. RUAG Australia, over US $5 million RUAG Australia is now the sole supplier of the jet’s uplock actuator system. This critical element allows for fast paced deployment of munitions through quick opening and closing the bay doors.
Increasing Calls for Transparency
The Australian government has come under fire for its opacity around military exports. Many have called for clearer traceability in light of the recent conflict in Gaza and the role that Australian-made components may play in it. Foreign Minister Penny Wong has repeatedly claimed that Australia is only providing “non-lethal” components for the F-35s. Secondly, she underscores that any arms transferred to Israel should fall on US arms manufacturers.
Critics say that despite Wong’s reassurances, it is Australia that will be culpable for any components Australia manufactures that are used in military actions. David Shoebridge, the Greens’ Defence and Foreign Affairs spokesperson, strongly disputes assertions that Australia has “no power whatsoever” over Lockheed Martin. He stresses that local businesses are an essential piece of the F-35 global supply chain.
“If components that are being manufactured here in Australia are finding their way into F-35 aircraft being used by Israel to bomb the hell out of Gaza, we share responsibility,” – Chris Sidoti, an Australian human rights expert.
Suzanne Varrall on the need for more transparency T4America She said the government does not regularly release information about its military exports. She observed that the only way to access this kind of information is through Freedom of Information applications or direct questioning in Senate estimates.
“It removes the ability for us to question or challenge the [government’s] decisions and to hold them accountable for them,” – Suzanne Varrall.
Disappearance of Key Information
In late 2023, Australia’s Department of Defence removed its webpage dedicated to F-35 industry participation, which has raised further concerns about the government’s intent and commitment to transparency. The page now redirects to a 404 page, with thousands left wondering why this important information was removed.
Return to Israel’s plans to increase its F-35 fleet. In June 2022, the country signed a contract with the US to buff its total up to 75 aircraft by 2028. A lack of public information makes it difficult for advocates seeking to find out just which Australian companies are contributing to the expansion. They ask whether these companies are adding anything novel.
Josh Paul of the advocacy group Responsible Statecraft dubbed the development clear as day communication. He pointed out that it’s important to define Australia’s role in the supply chain.
“Beyond the spare parts supply issue, Israel is procuring over 50 new F-35s from the consortium. Will none of these Australian companies be participating in that build? I’m sure they are,” – Josh Paul.
International Pressure and Legal Obligations
These calls for action have only grown louder since a ruling earlier this month by a Dutch court. The court told the government to stop the supply of F-35 components to Israel on the basis of international law considerations. The UN Human Rights Council similarly called on countries to do everything in their power to stop and prevent impending genocide in Gaza. Such developments have left Australia doubting its legal obligations with respect to military exports.
Critics like Chris Sidoti argue that regardless of trade relationships or supply chain dynamics, Australia must adhere to its legal responsibilities. He points out that the American government has been well aware of the detrimental consequence of their military support towards Israel’s actions.
“Right from the start of Israel’s attack on Gaza, the Albanese government has known they are actively supporting Israel’s military by sending them F-35 fighter jet parts,” – David Shoebridge.
Lara Khider, acting executive director at a human rights organization, echoed these sentiments, raising “further questions about transparency in the supply chain and Australian exports.”
